Papers with stance classification
Stakeholder Suite: A Unified AI Framework for Mapping Actors, Topics and Arguments in Public Debates (2026.eacl-demo)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing media intelligence tools rely on descriptive analytics with limited transparency. |
| Approach: | They propose a framework for mapping actors, topics, and arguments within public debates . it combines actor detection, topic modeling, argument extraction and stance classification . the framework is tested on multiple energy infrastructure projects as a case study . |
| Outcome: | The proposed framework delivers fine-grained, source-grounded insights while remaining adaptable to diverse domains. |
Advances in Debating Technologies: Building AI That Can Debate Humans (2021.acl-tutorials)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | This tutorial focuses on Debating Technologies, a sub-field of computational argumentation defined as "computational technologies developed directly to enhance, support, and engage with human debating" the tutorial provides a holistic view of a debated system, and discusses practical applications and future challenges of debation technologies. |
| Approach: | They present a tutorial on Debating Technologies, a sub-field of computational argumentation . they introduce Project Debater, which is the first AI system to debate human experts . |
| Outcome: | The project Debater is the first AI system to debate human experts on complex topics. |
AQE: Argument Quadruplet Extraction via a Quad-Tagging Augmented Generative Approach (2023.findings-acl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Argument mining involves multiple subtasks, but each one is insufficient for understanding argumentative structure and reasoning process. |
| Approach: | They propose a quadruplet extraction task that extracts four argumentative components . they use a generative quadragging module to augment the training of the generative framework . |
| Outcome: | The proposed method can extract arguments from a large-scale dataset. |
Topic Ontologies for Arguments (2023.findings-eacl)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Many computational argumentation tasks, such as stance classification, are topic-dependent. |
| Approach: | They map the argumentation landscape using the World Economic Forum, Wikipedia and Debatepedia as sources for argument topics. |
| Outcome: | The argument ontology is the first comprehensive assessment of argument topics in argument corpora. |
Cross-Target Stance Classification with Self-Attention Networks (P18-2)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | In stance classification, the target on which the stance is made defines the boundary of the task, and a classifier is usually trained for prediction on the same target. |
| Approach: | They propose a neural model that can generalize classifiers between different targets by finding useful information shared between relevant targets. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model can generalize between relevant targets and find useful information shared between relevant target domains which improves generalization in certain scenarios. |
IAM: A Comprehensive and Large-Scale Dataset for Integrated Argument Mining Tasks (2022.acl-long)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Argument mining (AM) is a computational process that is used to analyze information in a debating system. |
| Approach: | They propose to use a large dataset to automate the manual process of debating . they propose to integrate claim extraction, stance classification and evidence extraction tasks . |
| Outcome: | The proposed tasks can extract claims, stances, evidence and more from a large dataset . the proposed tasks are highly efficient and can be applied to argument mining tasks . |
CAM 2.0: End-to-End Open Domain Comparative Question Answering System (2024.lrec-main)
Copied to clipboard
Ahmad Shallouf, Hanna Herasimchyk, Mikhail Salnikov, Rudy Alexandro Garrido Veliz, Natia Mestvirishvili, Alexander Panchenko, Chris Biemann, Irina Nikishina
| Challenge: | Comparative Question Answering is a Natural Language Processing task that combines Question Answers and Argument Mining. |
| Approach: | They propose a system for answering comparative questions called CAM 2.0 and a public leaderboard called CompUGE that unifies existing datasets under a single easy-to-use evaluation suite. |
| Outcome: | The proposed system is compared with previous web-form-based systems . it features question identification, object and aspect labeling, stance classification, summarization . the proposed system has a user-friendly interface and is available for free on the web . |
All-in-one: Multi-task Learning for Rumour Verification (C18-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Automatic resolution of rumours is a challenging task that can be broken down into smaller components that make up a pipeline . previous work focused on rumor detection, rumou tracking and stance classification as separate components . |
| Approach: | They propose a multi-task learning approach that allows joint training of main and auxiliary tasks, improving the performance of rumour verification. |
| Outcome: | The proposed approach improves the performance of rumour verification by combining main and auxiliary tasks into one pipeline. |
Examining Temporalities on Stance Detection towards COVID-19 Vaccination (2024.lrec-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing studies have highlighted the importance of vaccination as an effective strategy to control the transmission of the COVID-19 virus. |
| Approach: | They evaluate a range of transformer-based models using chronological and random splits of social media data to examine the impact of temporal concept drift on stance detection towards COVID-19 vaccination. |
| Outcome: | The proposed models show that the models performed better with chronological and random splits than with random split models. |
STANCY: Stance Classification Based on Consistency Cues (D19-1)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Recent work has shown that stance classification is a critical step for information credibility and automated fact-checking. |
| Approach: | They propose a neural network model for stance classification leveraging BERT representations and augmenting them with a novel consistency constraint. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms existing methods on a Perspectrum dataset and shows that it is more accurate than existing methods. |
InfFeed: Influence Functions as a Feedback to Improve the Performance of Subjective Tasks (2024.lrec-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | InfFeed uses influence functions to compute the influential instances for a target instance. |
| Approach: | They propose an apparatus that uses influence functions to compute the influential instances for a target instance. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model outperforms the state-of-the-art baselines by 4% for hate speech classification, 3.5% for stance classification, and 3% for irony and 2% for sarcasm detection. |
On Classifying whether Two Texts are on the Same Side of an Argument (2021.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | Existing approaches to same side stance classification (S3C) require domain knowledge and semantic inference to solve the task. |
| Approach: | They propose to use same side stance classification to predict whether two arguments argue for the same stance for a given pair of arguments. |
| Outcome: | The proposed model fails to generalize both within and across topics and domains when adjusting the sampling strategy to a more adversarial scenario. |
Label Set Optimization via Activation Distribution Kurtosis for Zero-Shot Classification with Generative Models (2025.emnlp-main)
Copied to clipboard
| Challenge: | In-context learning (ICL) performance is highly sensitive to prompt design, yet the impact of class label options (e.g. lexicon or order) in zero-shot classification remains underexplored. |
| Approach: | They propose a post-hoc method for selecting optimal label sets in zero-shot ICL with large language models. |
| Outcome: | The proposed method consistently achieves performance gains of 0.54 to 0.76 compared to the conventional method. |